OELMA

Question One for OELMA Conference Credit:

Select one of the characteristics of an effective educator from the Stansbury article and explain how you meet this characteristic. (One or two paragraphs is sufficient).

Question Two for OELMA Conference Credit:

How can your role as a collaborator and leader in your school(s) affect student achievement?

Question Three for OELMA Conference Credit:

Comment on one new strategy or leadership technique that you would like to implement at your school.

Please respond to the question by clicking on comment.

How can your role as a collaborator and leader in your school affect student achievement?

Please respond to the question by clicking on comment.

Comment on the connection between collaborating with teachers and being a teacher leader in your school?

Please respond to the question by clicking on comment.

Comment on one new collaboration strategy or leadership technique you would like to implement at your school.

Do you want to have one of our upcoming meeting through distance learning?  How many have equipment to facilitate this?  What suggestions do you have for how we can implement this?

Kathy Cybulski

At our last OELMA board meeting, one of the Strategic Planning goals of my sub-group was to begin to design an award system for OELMA to recognize a Top Ten of school libraries in Ohio.  Based on the study done of other state library organizations in all 50 states as well as national library associations and their award systems, attached is a DRAFT. Let me say that again, IT’S A DRAFT.  It is NOT engraved in stone.

As part of the third phase of this goal (The first was to study other library organizations and their awards; the second phase was to write a DRAFT of an award system.), we hope to begin discussions of this DRAFT before its final presentation to the OELMA Board in December.  Remember folks, we aren’t trying to make this so easy that just any school and/or any district can achieve this distinction but we do want to recognize noteworthy individual libraries or districts with noteworthy libraries.  The best designed award systems included the state library organizations from Colorado, Missouri, Illinois, and Pennsylvania as well as AASL so feel free to look at those.

Points that were considered included:

• Requiring “adequate funding” from the district, but no library ever has enough money.
• Requiring OELMA membership of all applicants. Taken into consideration was the fact that all coaches’ associations require coaches to be a member before they are even able to nominate an athlete for an award such as playing in the North-South football game.

Please look over the attached document and send ideas for revision:

The purpose of this award is to annually recognize noteworthy individual school library media centers or entire districts with noteworthy school library media centers in the state of Ohio for achievement in the following areas:

Criteria for an individual school library media center includes:

• The school library media center in the nominated building is staffed by a full-time, certified school library media specialist who gives instruction, participates in curriculum development, and uses instructional technology.
• The library media specialist in the nominated school library media center is a current member of OELMA.
• The school library media specialist in the nominated school library media center demonstrates significant leadership in OELMA, which would include acting as an officer or regional director, OELMA liaison, or committee work.
• The school library media specialist in the nominated school library media center supports a library program that is integrated across the total school curriculum and collaborates with the faculty.
• The school library media center in the nominated school library media center is fully automated.
• The school library media specialist in the nominated school library media center collaborates with the local public librarians, college librarians, joint vocational school librarians, social service agencies, and/or other types of libraries in their area.
• The school library media specialist in the nominated school library media center must demonstrate noteworthy contributions that enhance the library experience.

The nominating library must provide a minimum of four of the following pieces of documentation with a maximum of one from each category. All letters of support must be signed, include contact information for the individual, be no more than one page in length (unless otherwise noted), and on official school or agency stationery:

• A letter of support from a district or building administrator.
• A letter of support from a parent in the community.
• A letter of support from a volunteer in the school system.
• A letter of support from a paraprofessional in the school system.
• A letter of support from a student in the school system.
• A letter of support from a librarian at the public library in demonstration of collaboration with the local library.
• A letter of support from a faculty member demonstrating creative and effective partnerships with the building’s faculty.
• A letter (1000 words or less) from the building’s school library media specialist demonstrating innovative ideas and contributions that enhance the library experience.

Criteria for a district nomination of its school library media centers includes:

• All school library media centers in the nominated district are staffed by full-time, certified school library media specialists who give instruction, participate in curriculum development, and use instructional technology.
• All library media specialists in the nominated district are current members of OELMA.
• A majority of the school library media specialists in the nominated district demonstrate significant leadership in OELMA.
• All school library media centers in the nominated district are fully automated.
• All school library media specialists in the nominated district collaborate with the local public librarians, college librarians, joint vocational school librarians, social service agencies, and/or other types of libraries in their area.
• All school library media specialists in the nominated district motivate students to become critical thinkers and life-long learners, who can locate, process, evaluate, synthesize, and utilize information.
• All school library media centers in the nominated district meet the diverse needs of the students and faculty.

The nominating district must provide a minimum of five of the following pieces of documentation with a maximum of one from each category. All letters of support must be signed, include contact information for the individual, be no more than one page in length (unless otherwise noted), and on official school or agency stationery:

• A letter of support from a district or building administrator.
• A letter of support from a parent in the community.
• A letter of support from a volunteer in the school system.
• A letter of support from a paraprofessional in the school system.
• A letter of support from a student in the school system.
• A letter of support from a librarian at the public library in demonstration of collaboration with the local library.
• A letter of support from a faculty member demonstrating creative and effective partnerships with the building’s faculty.
• A letter (each 1000 words or less) from two of the district’s media specialists demonstrating innovative ideas and contributions that enhance the library experience.

Required information will include:

1. Name of nominee, title, home and work phone numbers, email address, fax number.
2. Official name of district, superintendent, school building principal, school address and phone number.
3. Names of those writing letters of support, titles, and information needed for personal contact of each person.
4. Grade levels served and total number of students served in the nominated school library media center(s).
5. A signed letter on official school stationery providing the type of library automation currently being utilized.

All documentation for the nomination must be presented in one packet to the OELMA office by April 1^st and /or postmarked and sent to the OELMA office by April 1^st. No faxed information will be accepted.

All decisions of OELMA are final.

There weren’t a lot of conference attendees to show up at the Table Talks.  Do you think it was because of the times they took place, the location where they took place, or lack of advertising them? 

AuthorPalooza is an OELMA conference event- your chance to meet local authors! The event takes place near and around our vendor/exhibit area with appetizers available to munch on while you listen to your favorite authors. There are also beverages available to purchase. We want you to attend AuthorPalooza when you attend the OELMA Fall Conference. My question is- what can we do to entice you to spend some time with the authors? Please respond by clicking on comments.
Thanks- Marie Sabol, 2008 OELMA Conference Chair.

More conference 2009 thoughts!  We are exploring the idea of moving to a hotel & the Hilton @ Easton in Columbus seemed to be a logical place.  The Ohio Middle School Conference and the Gifted Conference have both been there in the past.  If Hilton is booked, of course, we have to have a block of rooms.   Is $179 too much to spend on a room?  Will folks eat @ Easton restaurants instead of supporting our food events?  Would shopping be too much of a lure & we’d loose folks to that instead of attending sessions??  Tell us what you think!